This repository has been archived on 2023-03-24. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues or pull requests.
rustlings-exercises-completed/move_semantics/move_semantics2.rs

55 lines
1.3 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

2018-02-22 00:09:53 -06:00
// move_semantics2.rs
2018-03-04 13:26:56 -06:00
// Make me compile without changing line 10! Scroll down for hints :)
pub fn main() {
let vec0 = Vec::new();
let mut vec1 = fill_vec(vec0);
// Do not change the following line!
println!("{} has length {} content `{:?}`", "vec0", vec0.len(), vec0);
vec1.push(88);
println!("{} has length {} content `{:?}`", "vec1", vec1.len(), vec1);
}
fn fill_vec(vec: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<i32> {
let mut vec = vec;
vec.push(22);
vec.push(44);
vec.push(66);
vec
}
// So `vec0` is being *moved* into the function `fill_vec` when we call it on
2018-03-04 13:26:56 -06:00
// line 7, which means it gets dropped at the end of `fill_vec`, which means we
// can't use `vec0` again on line 10 (or anywhere else in `main` after the
// `fill_vec` call for that matter). We could fix this in a few ways, try them
// all!
// 1. Make another, separate version of the data that's in `vec0` and pass that
// to `fill_vec` instead.
// 2. Make `fill_vec` borrow its argument instead of taking ownership of it,
// and then copy the data within the function in order to return an owned
// `Vec<i32>`
// 3. Make `fill_vec` *mutably* borrow its argument (which will need to be
// mutable), modify it directly, then not return anything. Then you can get rid
// of `vec1` entirely -- note that this will change what gets printed by the
// first `println!`